john deere: was important to midwestern farmers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lawn mower
Weight: 0.62
, corporation
Weight: 0.59
, customer
Weight: 0.58
, client
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.57
Siblings john maynard keynes
Weight: 0.36
, john irving
Weight: 0.36
, john von neumann
Weight: 0.34
, charles darwin
Weight: 0.34
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to midwestern farmers 1.00
was important to midwestern 0.93
was important to farmers 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(john deere, was important to midwestern)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(john deere, was important to midwestern)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(john deere, was important to midwestern)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(john deere, was important to farmers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(john deere, was important to farmers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(john deere, was important to farmers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(john deere, was important to midwestern)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(john deere, was important to farmers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(john deere, was important to midwestern farmers)