johnson: was great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.63
, friend
Weight: 0.60
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.37
, john smith
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great 1.00
has quality good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(johnson, was great)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(johnson, was great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(johnson, was great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(johnson, was great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(johnson, was great)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(johnson, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(johnson, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(johnson, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(johnson, was great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(johnson, was great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(johnson, was great)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)