:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pun, video)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(laughter, is video)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pun, video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pun, video)
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(joke, is video)
Similarity expansion
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(joke, video)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(joke, video)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(joke, video)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(joke, video)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(joke, videos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(joke, videos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(joke, is videos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(joke, videos)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(joke, videos)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(joke, is videos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(joke, is videos)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(joke, is videos)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(joke, is video)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(pun, video)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(joke, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(laughter, is video)