judge: be appointed in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be appointed in canada 1.00
be appointed 0.87
is appointed 0.86
be appointed to zealand supreme court 0.86
be appointed to new zealand supreme court 0.85
be appointed for life 0.85
be appointed under missouri plan 0.84
be picked in canada 0.82
be appointed by president 0.81
were appointed during time 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(justice, be appointed for life)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(justice, be appointed by president)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(justice, be appointed for life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(justice, be appointed by president)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(justice, be appointed for life)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(justice, be appointed by president)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(justice, be appointed for life)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(justice, be appointed by president)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(judge, is appointed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(judge, is appointed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed to new zealand supreme court)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(judge, be picked in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(judge, be picked in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed to new zealand supreme court)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(judge, be picked in canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(judge, be picked in canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(judge, is appointed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(judge, be appointed to new zealand supreme court)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(judge, be appointed to new zealand supreme court)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(judge, were appointed during time)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(judge, is appointed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed for life)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed by president)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed for life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed by president)