judge: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
wear wigs in australia 0.81
be picked in canada 0.80
be appointed in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(judge, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(judge, be picked in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(judge, be picked in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(judge, be picked in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(judge, be picked in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(judge, be in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(judge, be in australia)