judge: be in illinois

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in illinois 1.00
be in illinois court system 0.91
be in illinois court system chosen 0.88
is wisconsin 0.83
is virginia 0.81
be in texas 0.80
become in america 0.78
be selected in georgia 0.78
be selected in washington state 0.77
be in texas chosen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(justice, become in america)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(justice, become in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(justice, become in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(marshall, is wisconsin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(marshall, is virginia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(justice, become in america)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(marshall, is wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(marshall, is wisconsin)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(marshall, is virginia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(marshall, is virginia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in washington state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(justice, become in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(marshall, is wisconsin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marshall, is virginia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(justice, become in america)