judge: be in illinois court system chosen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in illinois court system chosen 1.00
be in illinois court system 0.96
be in illinois 0.88
be in court system chosen 0.87
be selected for montana supreme court 0.84
be selected in georgia 0.81
be in court system 0.81
be selected in washington state 0.81
be on court chosen 0.81
be important to court system 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(litigant, be important to court system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(litigant, be important to court system)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(litigant, be important to court system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in georgia)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in washington state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(litigant, be important to court system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)