judge: be selected in georgia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be selected in georgia 1.00
be selected in florida 0.88
be in texas chosen 0.86
be selected in north america 0.85
be selected in washington state 0.83
be in illinois court system chosen 0.81
be in texas 0.78
be selected 0.78
is selected 0.78
be selected for montana supreme court 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in georgia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in north america)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(judge, be in texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(judge, be in texas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in north america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in north america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(judge, be selected in washington state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas chosen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in north america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(judge, be selected in georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)