judge: be selected in washington state

Related concepts

Parents	activist Weight: 0.65 , officer Weight: 0.63 , justice Weight: 0.61 , trial Weight: 0.60
Siblings	supreme court Weight: 0.74 , defense attorney Weight: 0.64 , marshall Weight: 0.61 , contestant Weight: 0.53 , litigant Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be selected in washington state	1.00
be selected in florida	0.85
be selected in georgia	0.83
be selected in north america	0.83
be in illinois court system chosen	0.81
be in texas chosen	0.80
be selected for montana supreme court	0.77
be in illinois	0.77
become in america	0.77
be appointed under missouri plan	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(justice, become in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(justice, become in america)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(justice, become in america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(justice, be selected for montana supreme court) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(justice, become in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(judge, be selected in washington state)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in florida)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in georgia)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in north america)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(judge, be in texas chosen)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(judge, be in illinois)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(judge, be in illinois)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(judge, be in illinois)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in georgia)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in florida)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(judge, be selected in north america)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois court system chosen)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(judge, be in texas chosen)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(judge, be selected in georgia)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(judge, be in texas chosen)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(judge, be selected in north america)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(judge, be selected in florida)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(judge, be in illinois)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in georgia)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in florida)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in north america)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(judge, be in texas chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(judge, be selected in washington state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(justice, become in america)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(justice, become in america)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(judge, be selected in washington state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(justice, be selected for montana supreme court)