judge: have power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
have power 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(supreme court, have power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(judge, have power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, have power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, have power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(supreme court, have power)