judge: judge defendant to be guilty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, mayor
Weight: 0.58
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
judge defendant to be guilty 1.00
fine defendant 0.89
judge 0.87
clear defendant of all charge 0.86
rule in favor of defendant 0.84
milk defendant 0.84
prove that person be guilty 0.84
fine defendent 0.83
fine person find guilty 0.83
fine convict criminal 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, milk defendant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(lawyer, milk defendant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, milk defendant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(judge, fine defendant)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine defendant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(judge, rule in favor of defendant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(judge, fine defendent)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(judge, judge)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine defendent)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(judge, rule in favor of defendant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(judge, rule in favor of defendant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(judge, fine defendant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(judge, fine defendent)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(judge, clear defendant of all charge)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(judge, fine defendant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(judge, judge)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(judge, rule in favor of defendant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(judge, judge)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(judge, fine defendent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(lawyer, milk defendant)