judge: object to man behaviour

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, mayor
Weight: 0.58
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
object to man behaviour 1.00
object to question 0.82
object to line of question 0.79
object in court room 0.77
object to evidence 0.77
object to judge rule 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(defense attorney, object to judge rule)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court room)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object to question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(defense attorney, object to judge rule) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(defense attorney, object to judge rule)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object in court room)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lawyer, object to evidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to evidence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(judge, object to man behaviour)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(judge, object to man behaviour)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court room)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(defense attorney, object to judge rule)