judge: question witness

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, mayor
Weight: 0.58
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
question witness 1.00
require testimony from witness 0.85
subject witness to examination 0.85
be answer question 0.81
object to question 0.81
object to line of question 0.78
guess answer to question 0.77
wants to hear testimony 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(trial, wants to hear testimony)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(judge, question witness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(trial, wants to hear testimony)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(trial, wants to hear testimony)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contestant, be answer question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(contestant, guess answer to question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(trial, wants to hear testimony)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(judge, question witness)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, question witness)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(contestant, be answer question)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(contestant, be answer question)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(contestant, guess answer to question)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(contestant, guess answer to question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(judge, question witness)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(judge, require testimony from witness)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, require testimony from witness)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(judge, require testimony from witness)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judge, require testimony from witness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(judge, question witness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trial, wants to hear testimony)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(contestant, be answer question)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(contestant, guess answer to question)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(trial, wants to hear testimony)