judge: were appointed during time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.65
, officer
Weight: 0.63
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, trial
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.74
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.64
, marshall
Weight: 0.61
, contestant
Weight: 0.53
, litigant
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
were appointed during time 1.00
be appointed 0.92
is appointed 0.91
be appointed for life 0.91
be appointed by president 0.88
be appointed for behavior 0.87
be appointed for good behavior 0.86
be appointed preside over case 0.84
be appointed in canada 0.81
be appointed under missouri plan 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(justice, be appointed for life)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(justice, be appointed by president)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, were appointed during time)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(justice, be appointed for life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(justice, be appointed by president)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(justice, be appointed for life)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(justice, be appointed by president)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(justice, be appointed for life)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(justice, be appointed by president)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(judge, were appointed during time)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(judge, is appointed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(judge, is appointed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(judge, is appointed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(judge, is appointed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(judge, be appointed in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(judge, be appointed in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, were appointed during time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed for life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed by president)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed for life)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(judge, were appointed during time)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(justice, be appointed by president)