jumper cable: has quality joke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, gear
Weight: 0.56
, vehicle
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
, car
Weight: 0.55
Siblings pointer
Weight: 0.34
, cable
Weight: 0.34
, basket
Weight: 0.33
, bucket
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality joke 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality better 0.77
has quality use 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cable, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality joke)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality use)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality use)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality joke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pointer, has quality better)