jumper cable: has quality use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.60
, gear
Weight: 0.56
, vehicle
Weight: 0.56
, equipment
Weight: 0.55
, car
Weight: 0.55
Siblings pointer
Weight: 0.34
, cable
Weight: 0.34
, basket
Weight: 0.33
, bucket
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality use 1.00
has quality better 0.87
has quality bad 0.86
has quality joke 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cable, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cable, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cable, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(jumper cable, has quality joke)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality joke)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality joke)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality joke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cable, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cable, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pointer, has quality better)