junk food: be at conference

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, candy bar
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, soft drink
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at conference 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bad food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be at conference)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bad food, be at conference)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(bad food, be at conference)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bad food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at conference)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(junk food, be at conference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at conference)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(junk food, be at conference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bad food, be at conference)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(junk food, be at conference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bad food, be at conference)