junk food: be bad for person to eat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, candy bar
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, soft drink
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for person to eat 1.00
be eat by person 0.89
be bad for your health 0.86
be used to eat 0.84
be used to eat out 0.84
be nice to eat 0.84
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.83
wants to eat 0.82
be used to eat food 0.81
be good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(food, wants to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, wants to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for your health)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for your health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for person to eat)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for your health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(junk food, be bad for person to eat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)