junk food: be cheaper than fruits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than fruits 1.00
be cheaper than vegetables 0.91
be cheaper than food 0.88
be cheaper than healthy food 0.86
be cheaper than fresh food 0.86
is less expensive 0.80
be better than food 0.80
be better than healthy food 0.77
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stuff, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, is less expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)