junk food: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be good 0.89
feel good 0.85
be bad for people 0.84
be unhealthy for us 0.83
make us fat 0.81
has quality good 0.80
CAN can good 0.77
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stuff, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(stuff, feel good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stuff, feel good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(junk food, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, be good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(junk food, make us fat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(junk food, feel good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(junk food, be bad for people)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(junk food, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(junk food, make us fat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(junk food, make us fat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(junk food, feel good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for people)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(junk food, CAN can good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(junk food, make us fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, CAN can good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, CAN can good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, CAN can good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(stuff, feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)