junk food: has quality disadvantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality disadvantage 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(junk food, has quality disadvantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality disadvantage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(junk food, has quality disadvantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality disadvantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality disadvantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(junk food, has quality disadvantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality disadvantage)