junk food: is fast food addictive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fast food addictive 1.00
is food addictive 0.96
is addictive 0.90
is addicting 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bad food, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bad food, is addictive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is addictive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is addictive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bad food, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fast food, is addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fast food, is addictive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(junk food, is fast food addictive)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(junk food, is food addictive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(junk food, is food addictive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, is food addictive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(junk food, is addictive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is food addictive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, is addicting)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is addictive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is addicting)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, is addicting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(junk food, is addictive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(junk food, is addictive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(junk food, is addicting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bad food, is addictive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, is addictive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(junk food, is fast food addictive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bad food, is addictive)