junk food: is less expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.92
be cheaper than food 0.85
be cheaper than healthy food 0.82
be cheaper than fruits 0.80
be cheaper than fresh food 0.80
be cheaper than vegetables 0.79
is inexpensive 0.76
be better than food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(stuff, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stuff, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is inexpensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stuff, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(junk food, is less expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chocolate bar, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fast food, is inexpensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fast food, is inexpensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(junk food, is less expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fresh food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than fruits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, is inexpensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(junk food, be better than food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(junk food, is less expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, is inexpensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stuff, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(junk food, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)