jupiter: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents planet
Weight: 0.65
, object
Weight: 0.62
, deity
Weight: 0.62
, god
Weight: 0.58
, world
Weight: 0.58
Siblings planet earth
Weight: 0.36
, saturn
Weight: 0.35
, venus
Weight: 0.35
, comet
Weight: 0.35
, moon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named zeus 1.00
was named 1.00
is is named 0.97
be named 0.97
were named 0.95
was named after zeus 0.95
were named for 0.94
be named after zeus 0.93
was named jupiter 0.89
was named after jupiter 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(comet, be named)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(comet, be named)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(comet, were named)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(saturn, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(saturn, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(saturn, was named)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(comet, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(comet, be named)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(comet, be named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(comet, be named)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(comet, were named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(comet, were named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(jupiter, was named)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(jupiter, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(saturn, was named)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(comet, be named)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(comet, be named)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(jupiter, was named) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(comet, were named)