juror: is paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, witness
Weight: 0.54
, prejudice
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings jury
Weight: 0.59
, defendant
Weight: 0.36
, one person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34
, other person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid 1.00
get paid 0.96
is paid little 0.90
get paid little 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(juror, is paid)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(juror, is paid little)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(juror, get paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(juror, get paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(juror, is paid little)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(juror, get paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(juror, get paid little)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(juror, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(juror, get paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(juror, is paid little)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(juror, get paid little)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(juror, is paid little)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(juror, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(juror, is paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(juror, is paid)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(juror, is paid)