juror: was important in twelve men

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, witness
Weight: 0.54
, prejudice
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings jury
Weight: 0.59
, defendant
Weight: 0.36
, one person
Weight: 0.34
, elderly person
Weight: 0.34
, other person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in twelve men 1.00
was important in twelve angry men 0.95
be 3 in twelve men 0.94
be 3 in twelve angry men 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(juror, was important in twelve men)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(juror, be 3 in twelve angry men)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(juror, was important in twelve angry men)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(juror, be 3 in twelve men)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(juror, be 3 in twelve men)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(juror, be 3 in twelve angry men)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(juror, was important in twelve angry men)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(juror, be 3 in twelve men)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(juror, be 3 in twelve men)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(juror, be 3 in twelve angry men)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(juror, was important in twelve angry men)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(juror, was important in twelve angry men)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(juror, be 3 in twelve angry men)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(juror, was important in twelve men)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(juror, was important in twelve men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(juror, was important in twelve men)