jury: be important to legal system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents duty
Weight: 0.59
, juror
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.54
Siblings court case
Weight: 0.33
, trial
Weight: 0.32
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to legal system 1.00
be important to system 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(institution, be important to system)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(jury, be important to legal system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(institution, be important to system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(institution, be important to system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(institution, be important to system)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(jury, be important to legal system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(jury, be important to legal system)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(jury, be important to system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(jury, be important to system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(jury, be important to system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(jury, be important to system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(jury, be important to legal system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(jury, be important to legal system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(institution, be important to system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(jury, be important to legal system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(institution, be important to system)