justice: be considered blind

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents principle
Weight: 0.67
, crime
Weight: 0.66
, science
Weight: 0.62
, court
Weight: 0.61
, community
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.36
, liberty
Weight: 0.35
, supreme court
Weight: 0.34
, compassion
Weight: 0.34
, county court
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered blind 1.00
is blind 0.95
be portrayed as blind 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(liberty, is blind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(liberty, is blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(liberty, is blind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(justice, be considered blind)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(justice, is blind)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(justice, is blind)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(justice, be portrayed as blind)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(justice, be portrayed as blind)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(justice, is blind)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(justice, be portrayed as blind)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(justice, be portrayed as blind)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(justice, is blind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(justice, be considered blind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(justice, be considered blind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(justice, be considered blind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(liberty, is blind)