kansas: be as flat as pancake

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.59
, missouri
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
Siblings oklahoma
Weight: 0.63
, nebraska
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.34
, alabama
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as flat as pancake 1.00
is flat 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is flat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is flat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(iowa, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(iowa, is flat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nebraska, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nebraska, is flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(kansas, be as flat as pancake)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(kansas, is flat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is flat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(kansas, is flat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(kansas, is flat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(kansas, be as flat as pancake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(nebraska, is flat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(iowa, is flat)