kansas: is flat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.59
, missouri
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
Siblings oklahoma
Weight: 0.63
, nebraska
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.34
, alabama
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is flat 1.00
be as flat as pancake 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is flat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(iowa, is flat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(iowa, is flat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(nebraska, is flat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nebraska, is flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(kansas, is flat)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kansas, be as flat as pancake)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(kansas, be as flat as pancake)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(kansas, be as flat as pancake)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(kansas, be as flat as pancake)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is flat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(kansas, is flat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(nebraska, is flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is flat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(iowa, is flat)