keeping: has quality faith

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents idiot
Weight: 0.31
, training
Weight: 0.31
, challenge
Weight: 0.30
, property
Weight: 0.30
, commitment
Weight: 0.30
Siblings finding
Weight: 0.25
, anything
Weight: 0.24
, set
Weight: 0.24
, new job
Weight: 0.24
, motivation
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality faith 1.00
has quality good 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(keeping, has quality faith)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(keeping, has quality faith)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(keeping, has quality faith)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(commitment, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(training, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(commitment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(finding, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(motivation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(keeping, has quality faith)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(keeping, has quality faith)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(commitment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(keeping, has quality faith)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(motivation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(motivation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(finding, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(finding, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(keeping, has quality faith)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(keeping, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(keeping, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(keeping, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(keeping, has quality faith)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(motivation, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(finding, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(commitment, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(keeping, has quality faith) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)