keeping: was with british important to states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents idiot
Weight: 0.31
, training
Weight: 0.31
, challenge
Weight: 0.30
, property
Weight: 0.30
, commitment
Weight: 0.30
Siblings finding
Weight: 0.25
, anything
Weight: 0.24
, set
Weight: 0.24
, new job
Weight: 0.24
, motivation
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
was with british important to states 1.00
was with british important to united states 0.94
was with british important 0.94
was with british 0.91
be important to jewish people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(keeping, was with british important to states)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(keeping, was with british important to united states)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(keeping, was with british important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(keeping, was with british important to united states)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(keeping, was with british important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(keeping, was with british)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(keeping, was with british)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(keeping, was with british important to united states)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(keeping, was with british important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(keeping, was with british)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(keeping, was with british important to united states)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(keeping, was with british important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(keeping, be important to jewish people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(keeping, was with british)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(keeping, be important to jewish people)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(keeping, be important to jewish people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be important to jewish people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(keeping, was with british important to states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(keeping, was with british important to states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(keeping, was with british important to states)