kentucky: be fried chicken for naggers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fried chicken for naggers 1.00
be fried chicken 0.97
be fried chicken now kfc 0.96
be fried chicken kfc 0.96
fried chicken taste 0.95
fried chicken taste different 0.95
be fried 0.93
be fried chicken junk food 0.92
fried different 0.92
fried different now 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken kfc)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken kfc)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken kfc)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken kfc)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(kentucky, fried chicken taste)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(kentucky, fried chicken taste)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(kentucky, fried chicken taste)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be fried)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken junk food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(kentucky, be fried)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, fried chicken taste)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken junk food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(kentucky, fried chicken taste different)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken junk food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken junk food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken now kfc)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kentucky, fried different now)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(kentucky, fried chicken taste different)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be fried)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(kentucky, fried chicken taste different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, fried chicken taste different)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken now kfc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(kentucky, fried different now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(kentucky, fried different now)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken now kfc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken now kfc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, fried different now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(kentucky, be fried chicken for naggers)