kentucky: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school
Weight: 0.62
, virginia
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings george washington
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
has state state 0.79
is best state 0.77
be called state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(kentucky, is poor state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(kentucky, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(kentucky, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(virginia, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(virginia, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(virginia, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(virginia, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(georgia, is poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(virginia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is poor state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is poor state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(georgia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(georgia, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(missouri, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(missouri, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(west virginia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(kentucky, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(kentucky, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(kentucky, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(kentucky, be called state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(kentucky, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(kentucky, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is best state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kentucky, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(kentucky, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(kentucky, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(virginia, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(georgia, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(west virginia, is poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(missouri, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(virginia, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(kentucky, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(virginia, is poor)