kenya: be underdeveloped despite resource potential

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents africa
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be underdeveloped despite resource potential 1.00
be underdeveloped despite huge resource potential 0.98
is underdeveloped 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(africa, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(africa, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(country, is underdeveloped)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(africa, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(nigeria, is underdeveloped)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is underdeveloped)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(africa, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(latin america, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(zambia, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zambia, is underdeveloped)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(nigeria, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nigeria, is underdeveloped)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite huge resource potential)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(kenya, be underdeveloped despite huge resource potential)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite huge resource potential)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite huge resource potential)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(kenya, is underdeveloped)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(kenya, is underdeveloped)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(kenya, is underdeveloped)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is underdeveloped)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(africa, is underdeveloped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(nigeria, is underdeveloped)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(zambia, is underdeveloped)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(kenya, be underdeveloped despite resource potential) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(africa, is underdeveloped)