kenya: is econically developed country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents africa
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is econically developed country 1.00
is developed country 1.00
is less developed country 0.93
is low developed country 0.92
is low econically developed country 0.92
is developed 0.91
is developing country 0.90
be considered developing country 0.89
is economically developed country 0.88
develop country 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing country)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(africa, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(africa, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing country)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(kenya, is less developed country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kenya, is less developed country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is less developed country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low developed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(kenya, is less developed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(kenya, is developed country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(kenya, is low developed country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developed country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kenya, develop country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low developed country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(kenya, is low developed country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(kenya, develop country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, develop country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(kenya, is developing country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kenya, develop country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developing country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(kenya, is developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing country)