kenya: was important to british empire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents africa
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to british empire 1.00
was involved in british empire 0.96
was important to empire 0.90
was involved in empire 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(south africa, was important to empire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(south africa, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(south africa, was important to empire)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(south africa, was important to empire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(kenya, was important to british empire)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(kenya, was involved in british empire)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was involved in british empire)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kenya, was involved in british empire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kenya, was involved in british empire)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(kenya, was important to empire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(kenya, was involved in empire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kenya, was important to empire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(kenya, was important to empire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kenya, was involved in empire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(kenya, was involved in empire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was involved in empire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was important to empire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(kenya, was important to british empire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south africa, was important to british empire)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, was important to british empire)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(south africa, was important to empire)