ketchup: be illegal in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in france 1.00
be banned in france 0.91
be illegal in chicago 0.83
be banned in chicago 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ketchup, be illegal in france)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be illegal in chicago)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be illegal in chicago)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ketchup, be illegal in chicago)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ketchup, be banned in france)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be banned in france)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be banned in chicago)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be banned in chicago)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(ketchup, be banned in chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ketchup, be illegal in chicago)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ketchup, be banned in france)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ketchup, be banned in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(ketchup, be banned in chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(ketchup, be illegal in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(ketchup, be illegal in france)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ketchup, be illegal in france)