key: working on laptop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.72
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, access
Weight: 0.57
, instrument
Weight: 0.56
Siblings key ring
Weight: 0.62
, tab
Weight: 0.56
, insert
Weight: 0.53
, enter
Weight: 0.47
, esc
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
working on laptop 1.00
stick on computer 0.79
be on ipad keyboard 0.76
be on where keyboard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tab, be on ipad keyboard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tab, be on ipad keyboard)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tab, be on ipad keyboard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(key, working on laptop)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(key, stick on computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(key, stick on computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(key, stick on computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(key, be on where keyboard)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(key, be on where keyboard)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(key, stick on computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(key, be on where keyboard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(key, be on where keyboard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(key, working on laptop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(key, working on laptop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(key, working on laptop)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tab, be on ipad keyboard)