kidnapping: be in mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.67
, felony
Weight: 0.67
, charge
Weight: 0.61
, danger
Weight: 0.58
Siblings abduction
Weight: 0.39
, murder
Weight: 0.37
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, robbery
Weight: 0.36
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mexico 1.00
increase in mexico city 0.91
be in india 0.82
be in canada 0.81
be in alabama 0.80
be high in latin america 0.79
be high in florida 0.79
occur in india 0.79
be in utah 0.79
be in brazil 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crime, increase in mexico city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(crime, be in brazil)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, be in utah)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(felony, be in utah)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in mexico city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(crime, be in brazil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in mexico city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(felony, be in utah)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in brazil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(first degree murder, be in canada)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(rape, be in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(murder, be in alabama)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rape, occur in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crime, increase in mexico city)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(crime, be in brazil)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, be in utah)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(first degree murder, be in canada)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(first degree murder, be in canada)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(rape, be in india)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rape, be in india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(murder, be in alabama)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(murder, be in alabama)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rape, occur in india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(rape, occur in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(kidnapping, be in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crime, increase in mexico city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(felony, be in utah)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(crime, be in brazil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(first degree murder, be in canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(rape, be in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(murder, be in alabama)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rape, occur in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(felony, be in utah)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crime, increase in mexico city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(kidnapping, be in mexico)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(crime, be in brazil)