kidney: be said retroperitoneal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents urinary tract
Weight: 0.66
, complication
Weight: 0.66
, body part
Weight: 0.66
, organ
Weight: 0.64
Siblings kidney stone
Weight: 0.72
, hemolytic anemia
Weight: 0.64
, diabetes
Weight: 0.64
, liver
Weight: 0.62
, pyelonephritis
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be said retroperitoneal 1.00
be called retroperitoneal 0.95
is retroperitoneal 0.94
complication of is biopsy 0.80
is vascularized 0.79
be biopsy reported 0.79
cause microvascular complications 0.78
produce ascites 0.78
be biopsy 0.78
biopsy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(liver, produce ascites)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(liver, produce ascites) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(liver, produce ascites)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liver, biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(liver, biopsy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(liver, produce ascites)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)