killing: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, act
Weight: 0.58
, violence
Weight: 0.56
Siblings homicide
Weight: 0.65
, honor killing
Weight: 0.38
, murder
Weight: 0.37
, kidnapping
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
has quality good 0.77
is answer 0.77
has quality wrong 0.76
is important issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(killing, has quality question)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(killing, has quality question)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(violence, is answer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(killing, has quality question)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(violence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(killing, has quality question)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(violence, is answer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(violence, is answer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality wrong)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(homicide, has quality wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(murder, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(act, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(violence, is answer)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(violence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(violence, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(murder, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(murder, has quality wrong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(homicide, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(homicide, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(killing, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(killing, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(killing, has quality wrong)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(killing, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(killing, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(killing, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(violence, is answer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(violence, has quality wrong)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(kidnapping, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(murder, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(homicide, has quality wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(violence, is answer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(violence, has quality wrong)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(killing, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality good)