king: were selected in ancient israel

Related concepts

Parents	monarch Weight: 0.79 , ruler Weight: 0.72 , legend Weight: 0.67 , queen Weight: 0.66 , leader Weight: 0.66
Siblings	tyrant Weight: 0.57 , queen elizabeth Weight: 0.38 , stephen king Weight: 0.38 , prince Weight: 0.37 , god Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were selected in ancient israel	1.00
were selected in egypt	0.85
be in ancient egypt called	0.83
was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt	0.82
be chosen in saudi arabia	0.81
be tutankhamun crucial from ancient egypt	0.78
were in scotland chosen 11th century	0.76
were important to egyptians	0.76
were selscted in egypt	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(queen, were important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(queen, were important to egyptians)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(queen, were important to egyptians)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(queen, were important to egyptians) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(king, were selected in egypt)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(king, were selscted in egypt)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(king, were selscted in egypt)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(king, were selscted in egypt)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(king, were selscted in egypt)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(queen, were important to egyptians)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(queen, were important to egyptians)