king: were selected in egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monarch
Weight: 0.79
, ruler
Weight: 0.72
, legend
Weight: 0.67
, queen
Weight: 0.66
, leader
Weight: 0.66
Siblings tyrant
Weight: 0.57
, queen elizabeth
Weight: 0.38
, stephen king
Weight: 0.38
, prince
Weight: 0.37
, god
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were selected in egypt 1.00
were selscted in egypt 0.87
were selected in ancient israel 0.85
were selected 0.84
be chosen in saudi arabia 0.83
were chosen 0.82
be in ancient egypt called 0.80
was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt 0.79
were in scotland chosen 11th century 0.76
be tutankhamun crucial from ancient egypt 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ruler, were chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(ruler, were selected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(ruler, were chosen)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were selected)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(ruler, were chosen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(ruler, were selected)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(ruler, were chosen)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(king, were selected in egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(king, was tutankhamun important to ancient egypt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ruler, were selected)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ruler, were selected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ruler, were chosen)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)