kingfisher: has physical part beaks

Related concepts

Parents	bird Weight: 0.65 , wildlife Weight: 0.58 , species Weight: 0.57 , brand Weight: 0.54 , airline Weight: 0.52
Siblings	peregrine falcon Weight: 0.38 , heron Weight: 0.38 , robin Weight: 0.37 , owl Weight: 0.37 , blue bird Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part beaks	1.00
have long beaks	0.94
has physical part legs	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(kingfisher, has physical part beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part legs)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(heron, have long beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(heron, has physical part legs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(kingfisher, has physical part beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, have long beaks)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part legs)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(kingfisher, has physical part legs)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(kingfisher, has physical part legs)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part legs)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(kingfisher, have long beaks)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(kingfisher, have long beaks)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(kingfisher, have long beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(kingfisher, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(heron, has physical part legs)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(kingfisher, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)