knitting: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, hobby
Weight: 0.56
, group
Weight: 0.53
, item
Weight: 0.52
Siblings quilting
Weight: 0.36
, sewing
Weight: 0.35
, woodworking
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
is popular again 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(woodworking, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quilting, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(quilting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(quilting, is popular)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(woodworking, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(woodworking, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(knitting, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(knitting, is popular again)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(knitting, is popular again)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(knitting, is popular again)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(knitting, is popular again)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knitting, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(knitting, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(quilting, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knitting, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodworking, is popular)