knowing: be useful to scientists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attribute
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.48
, movie
Weight: 0.46
, act
Weight: 0.46
, time
Weight: 0.44
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.31
, knowledge
Weight: 0.31
, him
Weight: 0.30
, everybody
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to scientists 1.00
be helpful to chemists 0.82
be important to ecologists 0.81
be useful 0.80
be helpful to geographers 0.79
is useful 0.79
be useful in life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(knowledge, is useful)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(knowledge, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(knowing, be useful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(knowing, be useful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(knowing, is useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be important to ecologists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(knowing, be useful in life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be helpful to chemists)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(knowing, be useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(knowing, be useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(knowing, is useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(knowing, be useful in life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be helpful to geographers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be useful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(knowing, be useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(knowing, be useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(knowing, is useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(knowing, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(knowing, be important to ecologists)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be useful in life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(knowing, be useful in life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(knowing, be helpful to chemists)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(knowing, be helpful to geographers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(knowing, be important to ecologists)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(knowing, be helpful to geographers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(knowing, be helpful to chemists)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(knowing, be helpful to geographers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(knowing, be important to ecologists)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(knowing, be helpful to chemists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(knowing, be useful to scientists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(knowing, be useful to scientists)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(knowledge, is useful)