knowledge: contribute to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, force
Weight: 0.63
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, benefit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.35
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.34
, intellect
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.34
, insight
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to technology 1.00
contribute to engineering 0.84
contribute to acquisition of science 0.79
benefit whole computing community 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(knowledge, contribute to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to engineering)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, benefit whole computing community)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(knowledge, contribute to engineering)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(knowledge, contribute to engineering)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to engineering)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(knowledge, benefit whole computing community)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(knowledge, benefit whole computing community)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to acquisition of science)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(knowledge, benefit whole computing community)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(knowledge, contribute to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(knowledge, contribute to technology)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(knowledge, contribute to technology)