lab: have different reference ranges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents room
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings clean room
Weight: 0.33
, hotel room
Weight: 0.33
, common room
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different reference ranges 1.00
have reference ranges 0.98
determine reference ranges 0.94
have different ranges 0.93
use different ranges 0.93
ranges different 0.93
have ranges 0.91
use ranges 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(lab, have different reference ranges)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lab, use different ranges)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lab, have different ranges)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lab, ranges different)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lab, use different ranges)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lab, use different ranges)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(lab, have different ranges)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lab, ranges different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lab, have different ranges)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lab, ranges different)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lab, have different ranges)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lab, ranges different)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lab, use different ranges)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lab, have different reference ranges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(lab, have different reference ranges)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lab, have different reference ranges)