labour: be opposed to mcdonalds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.54
, group
Weight: 0.54
, input
Weight: 0.53
, sector
Weight: 0.53
, policy
Weight: 0.52
Siblings functional group
Weight: 0.28
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.28
, terrorist organization
Weight: 0.28
, natural gas
Weight: 0.28
, financial institution
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be opposed to mcdonalds 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(labour, be opposed to mcdonalds)